More Stories

Informist, Friday, Apr. 24, 2026

 

NEW DELHI – The Supreme Court has issued a notice to Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. on Motorola Solutions Inc.'s plea against a Delhi High Court's November order to direct fresh hearing in the arbitration dispute between the parties. In November, the division bench of the Delhi High Court had ordered its single judge to hear afresh MTNL's challenge against arbitral awards asking the company to pay INR 1 billion to Motorola Inc., with 15% interest, and to return the latter's bank guarantees. The apex court will hear the case next on May 18.

 

The case has its genesis in MTNL issuing a tender inviting offers for a project from manufacturers and suppliers of wireless local loop, Code Division Multiple Access IS 95A technology in 1999. Motorola emerged as the successful bidder in 2000.

 

Over the years, several communications and meetings took place between the parties to resolve issues arising from the execution of the project. In 2008, Motorola invoked arbitration to seek the release of outstanding payments, along with interest. In 2013, the arbitral tribunal awarded in favour of Motorola, directing MTNL to pay $8.77 million and INR 222.92 million, which totalled INR 1 billion. The arbitrator further awarded interest at 15% per annum. Subsequently, by an additional award in 2015, the arbitrator directed Mahanagar Telephone Nigam to release Motorola's bank guarantees. Challenging both the arbitral awards, MTNL moved the single-judge bench of the high court, which ruled in favour of Motorola in 2017.

 

In an appeal, the division bench set aside the single judge's 2017 order, which had upheld the arbitral awards of 2013 and 2015. The division bench of Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar said that the single judge's verdict cannot be sustained in so far as it failed to address certain central objections. The single judge's order does not meaningfully engage with or decide Mahanagar Telephone Nigam's substantive challenges, the division bench said. 

 

The bench said that Mahanagar Telephone Nigam had specifically contended that the second purchase order was an independent, self-contained contract, and that the arbitral tribunal's award of interest at 15% per annum on both the foreign currency and rupee components was illegal and unsustainable. These contentions, though squarely raised, remain unexamined and unsupported by any reasoned analysis in the single judge's order. The failure to deal with these objections is not merely a procedural shortcoming but a material error in the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the division bench said.

 

Friday, the shares of MTNL ended 3.7% lower at INR 30.61 on the National Stock Exchange.  End

 

Reported by Surya Tripathi

Edited by Akul Nishant Akhoury

 

For users of real-time market data terminals, Informist news is available exclusively on the NSE Cogencis WorkStation.

 

Cogencis news is now Informist news. This follows the acquisition of Cogencis Information Services Ltd. by NSE Data & Analytics Ltd., a 100% subsidiary of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. As a part of the transaction, the news department of Cogencis has been sold to Informist Media Pvt. Ltd.

 

Informist Media Tel +91 (11) 4220-1000

Send comments to feedback@informistmedia.com

 

© Informist Media Pvt. Ltd. 2026. All rights reserved.