logo
appgoogle
EquityWireRules Amendment: SC refuses stay on HC fact-check unit order, to hear Kunal Kamra case first
Rules Amendment

SC refuses stay on HC fact-check unit order, to hear Kunal Kamra case first

This story was originally published at 12:24 IST on 10 March 2026
Register to read our real-time news.
Rules-Amendment-SC-refuses-stay-on-HC-fact-check-unit-order-to-hear-Kunal-Kamra-case-first

Informist, Tuesday, Mar. 10, 2026

 

--SC notice to Kunal Kamra on govt plea vs HC order on fact-check unit case 

--CONTEXT: HC struck down amendment to IT rule on fact-check unit in Kamra case 

--SC refuses to stay HC order on fact-check unit, to hear Kamra case first 

 

NEW DELHI – The Supreme Court Tuesday refused to stay the Bombay High Court's 2024 order that struck down the amendments made in 2023 to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. The amendments empowered the government to set up a fact-checking body to identify and tag "false" or "fake" online news with respect to any of its activities. The bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said that it will hear the matter first at the earliest.

 

The top court issued notices to comedian Kunal Kamra, the Editors Guild of India and the Association of Indian Magazines on the government's appeal against the high court order. The apex court placed the government's appeal before a three judge bench for hearing. 

 

Some of the online platforms act in a dangerous way that can be very damaging and clear guidelines are required, said the court. "Question is of paramount importance and it is better the Supreme Court lays down the law. It is about balancing without compromising the constitutional values," said Chief Justice Kant.

 

The amendments stated that social media platforms like Meta, Instagram, YouTube, and X would be legally obliged to take down content flagged as misinformation by the fact-checking unit or face litigation. The amendments to the information technology rules also stated that telecom service providers and social media intermediaries would have to take action against such alleged fake content, failing which they would lose safe harbour protection under the information technology law. 

 

Kamra and others had argued that the amendments struck at the rule of law, and constituted a direct assault by the government on freedom of speech and expression. In 2024, the high court said the amendments violate Article 14, Article 19, and Article 21 of the Constitution and do not satisfy the "test of proportionality". Challenging the high court's order, the government moved the apex court.  End

 

Reported by Surya Tripathi

Edited by Deepshikha Bhardwaj

 

For users of real-time market data terminals, Informist news is available exclusively on the NSE Cogencis WorkStation.

 

Cogencis news is now Informist news. This follows the acquisition of Cogencis Information Services Ltd. by NSE Data & Analytics Ltd., a 100% subsidiary of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. As a part of the transaction, the news department of Cogencis has been sold to Informist Media Pvt. Ltd.

 

Informist Media Tel +91 (22) 6985-4000

Send comments to feedback@informistmedia.com

 

© Informist Media Pvt. Ltd. 2026. All rights reserved.

To read more please subscribe

Share this Story:

twitterlinkedinwhatsappmaillinkprint

Related Stories

Premium Stories

Subscribe