ANALYSIS
Auto cos' Q1 PAT growth below estimates; fourth straight YoY fall
This story was originally published at 20:35 IST on 26 August 2025
Register to read our real-time news.Informist, Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025
By Anand JC
NEW DELHI – Automobile and automobile component makers' aggregate bottom line contracted year-on-year for the fourth consecutive quarter in the June quarter and missed analysts' expectations. The June quarter, which is traditionally a weak quarter for automobile companies, saw key metrics come under even more pressure due to disappointing sales, analysts said.
The aggregate net profit of 18 automobile and automobile component companies fell 17% on year for the June quarter. This was poorer than analysts' expectations of an 11?ll, and markedly worse than the Nifty 200 companies' aggregate bottom line growth of over 7%. Excluding one-time income and expenses, the automobile companies' net profit contraction moderates to a 3.5?ll, noticeably lower than the 10% growth in Nifty 200 companies' net profit adjusted for one-time items.
The bottom line growth of eight companies in the sector – Bharat Forge Ltd., Bosch Ltd., Eicher Motors Ltd., Escorts Kubota Ltd., Exide Industries Ltd., Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., TVS Motor Co. Ltd., and Ashok Leyland Ltd.— exceeded the Nifty 200 companies' aggregate net profit growth for the latest quarter. However, adjusted net profit growth of only seven companies -- Apollo Tyres Ltd., Bosch, Escorts Kubota, Exide Industries, M&M, TVS Motor, and Ashok Leyland — exceeded Nifty 200 companies' overall bottom line adjusted for one-time losses and gains.
Among original equipment manufacturers, Tata Motors Ltd. lagged the most as its profitability was hit by weakness in passenger vehicle segment and in the Jaguar Land Rover unit. The 63% on-year contraction in the Safari maker's bottom line for the June quarter moderates to a 29?ll if one-time items are excluded.
These 18 companies' aggregate top line for the quarter under review grew 3.6% on year, better than analysts' expectations of a 1.8% contraction. However, their revenue growth was still lower than that of Nifty 200 companies, which increased 5.6% on year.
This was the weakest June quarter in terms of revenue growth for the 18 firms since 2021-22 (Apr-Mar), based on available data. The 3.6% revenue growth is also the weakest expansion in top line in the past three quarters. Amid weak despatches, companies' revenue growth was actually driven by a combination of price hikes and product mix, analysts said.
"Automobile companies' profit contracted, but revenue grew because of pricing action taken by a lot of companies during Q1," Ravi Gupta, an analyst covering the sector at InCred Capital said.
This single-digit revenue growth was due to a change in the "product mix" of companies' portfolio, Neel Doshi, Senior Research Associate covering the sector at Elara Securities, said. "If you see, companies are selling more utility vehicles which cost more. Even in commercial vehicles you are seeing higher sales of high-tonnage vehicles," Doshi said.
This price-led growth in automobile companies' top line is evident in the fact that the average selling prices of majority original equipment manufacturers improved year-on-year in the June quarter. Eight out of ten automakers part of Nifty 200 reported a year-on-year growth in the average selling price for the June quarter, Kotak Institutional Equities said in a note. Four companies' realisation per vehicle grew by mid-single digits.
INPUT PRICE PRESSURE
Total aggregate expenses incurred by these 18 firms grew just over 5.4% for the reporting quarter. Raw material costs form the bulk (bulk is significant) of these companies' overall cost, at around 64% of overall expenses on an aggregate basis.
The cost of materials consumed by the 18 companies rose nearly 8% for the reporting quarter, faster than the growth in overall expenses. While this is lower than the 16% on-year growth in input costs in the year-ago quarter, this is the highest since then. "Prices of commodities haven't softened as expected, they've remained stable," Doshi said.
The aggregate raw material-to-sales of the 18 companies was 59% in the June quarter, much higher than the 55% in the March quarter and the 57% in the year-ago quarter. A higher reading of this key performance indicator suggests that raw material costs are taking a larger part of the company's top line.
This uptick in raw material prices weighed on the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation of the 18 auto firms. The aggregate EBITDA of the 18 companies fell a staggering 14% on year, according to data from Kotak and company filings. However, excluding the 37?ll registered by Tata Motors, the fall reverses to a 1% gain.
Among the original equipment manufacturers, the EBITDA of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. and TVS Motor Co. Ltd. grew 21% and 32% on year, each, while Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd.'s EBITDA fell over 19%, the second-worst EBITDA reading after Tata Motors among automobile companies.
The poor performance of automobile companies trickled down to component makers as well, Doshi said. "Tyre companies were under pressure as demand did not flow from original equipment makers," he said.
According to Doshi, auto component companies with exposure to domestic two-wheeler makers fared well during the quarter. However, forging companies had a muted June quarter due to an impact of tariffs coupled with weak demand in the international markets. "Globally exposed companies haven't performed well," he said.
TRANSPORT SECTOR
The transport sector as a whole, comprising 21 firms involved in operations related to automobile, auto ancillary, ports, airports and airport infrastructure, recorded a profit contraction for the fourth consecutive quarter. Their aggregate bottom line fell just over 15% year-on-year, which moderates to a 5?ll on exclusion of one-time items – both worse than Nifty 200. Analysts had expected the sector's profit to fall 11%.
Their revenue growth of 4.3% on year was the slowest in the past three quarters, again underperforming the Nifty 200, but exceeding analysts expectations of 0.6% contraction.
Total expenses grew just over 6% for the reporting quarter as cost of materials consumed grew at a four-quarter high year-on-year. Staff costs, which form nearly 10% of overall costs, grew over 9%, the lowest since June quarter of 2022-23 (Apr-Mar).
The following table shows the performance of the 18 companies in the transport sector vis-a-vis the consensus estimate for each company as well as against the consensus estimate for the sectors and the Nifty 200 index:
|
June quarter |
PAT growth (Actual) |
PAT growth (Estimate) |
Revenue growth (Actual) |
Revenue growth (Estimate) |
|
Nifty 200 (YoY) |
9.95% |
10.30% |
5.64% |
2.11% |
|
Transport (21 companies) |
-4.99% |
-11.12% |
4.30% |
-0.60% |
|
Auto & auto ancillary companies (18 companies) |
-2.62% |
-13.21% |
3.25% |
-3.73% |
|
Company |
PAT beat analysts' estimate for co |
Adjusted PAT growth % |
Adjusted PAT growth estimate % |
PAT beat transport sector growth |
PAT beat Nifty 200 growth |
|
Revenue beat analysts' estimate for co |
Revenue growth % |
Revenue growth estimate % |
Revenue beat transport sector growth |
Revenue beat Nifty 200 growth |
|
|
Adani Ports |
YES |
1.73 |
-8.97 |
YES |
NO |
YES |
20.72 |
14.93 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
Apollo Tyres |
YES |
11.88 |
-6.55 |
YES |
YES |
NO |
3.57 |
5.42 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Ashok Leyland |
NO |
12.97 |
15.11 |
YES |
YES |
NO |
1.47 |
2.05 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Bajaj Auto |
YES |
5.41 |
1.99 |
YES |
NO |
YES |
5.50 |
3.17 |
YES |
NO |
||
|
Bharat Forge |
NO |
-18.45 |
-12.99 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
-9.98 |
3.17 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Bosch |
YES |
20.17 |
8.68 |
YES |
YES |
YES |
10.93 |
7.94 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
Eicher Motors |
YES |
9.42 |
3.23 |
YES |
NO |
YES |
14.77 |
13.29 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
Escorts Kubota |
YES |
15.55 |
12.29 |
YES |
YES |
NO |
-2.85 |
0.20 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Exide Industries |
YES |
14.62 |
8.63 |
YES |
YES |
NO |
4.57 |
5.94 |
YES |
NO |
||
|
GMR Airports |
-- |
N.A. |
N.A. |
-- |
-- |
YES |
33.43 |
25.42 |
YES |
NO |
||
|
Hero Motocorp |
YES |
0.27 |
-5.45 |
YES |
NO |
NO |
-5.57 |
-3.45 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Hyundai Motor India |
YES |
-8.08 |
-14.98 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
-5.37 |
-2.13 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Interglobe Aviation |
NO |
-20.74 |
-10.33 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
4.73 |
7.85 |
YES |
NO |
||
|
Mahindra and Mahindra |
YES |
32.04 |
19.22 |
YES |
YES |
YES |
25.84 |
24.57 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
Maruti Suzuki India |
YES |
1.69 |
-17.25 |
YES |
NO |
YES |
8.11 |
2.58 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
MRF |
NO |
-13.92 |
-0.77 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
6.82 |
6.97 |
YES |
YES |
||
|
Ola Electric Mobility |
-- |
N.A. |
N.A. |
-- |
-- |
YES |
-49.64 |
-58.33 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Samvardhana Motherson |
NO |
-34.79 |
1.40 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
4.66 |
7.90 |
YES |
NO |
||
|
Sona BLW Precision |
YES |
-5.68 |
-6.00 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
-4.72 |
-3.79 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
Tata Motors |
YES |
-28.93 |
-40.52 |
NO |
NO |
YES |
-2.52 |
-16.43 |
NO |
NO |
||
|
TVS Motor Co. |
YES |
34.86 |
29.76 |
YES |
YES |
YES |
20.36 |
19.29 |
YES |
YES |
End
Data compiled by Vinod Bhovad
Edited by Deepshikha Bhardwaj
For users of real-time market data terminals, Informist news is available exclusively on the NSE Cogencis WorkStation.
Cogencis news is now Informist news. This follows the acquisition of Cogencis Information Services Ltd. by NSE Data & Analytics Ltd., a 100% subsidiary of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. As a part of the transaction, the news department of Cogencis has been sold to Informist Media Pvt. Ltd.
Informist Media Tel +91 (22) 6985-4000
Send comments to feedback@informistmedia.com
© Informist Media Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All rights reserved.
To read more please subscribe
