logo
appgoogle
EquityWireDelimitation Plea: SC dismisses plea seeking delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana
Delimitation Plea

SC dismisses plea seeking delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana

This story was originally published at 11:47 IST on 25 July 2025
Register to read our real-time news.

Informist, Friday, Jul. 25, 2025

 

--SC junks plea seeking delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana 

--CONTEXT:Plea sought delimitation to raise Andhra, Telangana assembly seats 

 

NEW DELHI – The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking a direction to the Centre to conduct a delimitation exercise to increase the legislative assembly states in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The top court held that Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, dealing with delimitation, was subject to the Constitutional provision of Article 170(3), according to which delimitation can be held only after the first census conducted after 2026.

 

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and N.K. Singh said Article 170(3) acts as a Constitutional bar in entertaining the plea for delimitation. Article 170(3) deals with the composition of legislative assemblies in states. To allow such a prayer to increase assembly seats will open the "floodgates" of litigation by other states, said the bench.

 

The court rejected petitioner Professor K. Purushottam Reddy's argument that delimitation was conducted for Jammu and Kashmir and assembly seats of the union territory were increased. Reddy had argued that Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were left out of the delimitation and that the same was arbitrary. The top court held that the exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the delimitation notification issued for Jammu and Kashmir was not arbitrary or discriminatory. "Jammu and Kashmir having been reconstituted is not governed by chapter 3 of part 7 of the Constitution," said the court.  

 

Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, appearing for the Centre, had argued that the delimitation process could be undertaken only after the 2026 census was concluded and that delimitation was a humongous exercise and couldn't be undertaken overnight. The delimitation exercise in Jammu and Kashmir was in the case of union territory and it couldn't be equated with the state, said Nataraj. However, the petitioner argued that Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Nagaland were also included in the prior delimitation notification issued by the Centre, but not Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, though the northeastern states were also governed by Article 170(3) of the Constitution.  End 

 

Reported by Surya Tripathi

Edited by Vandana Hingorani

 

For users of real-time market data terminals, Informist news is available exclusively on the NSE Cogencis WorkStation.

 

Cogencis news is now Informist news. This follows the acquisition of Cogencis Information Services Ltd by NSE Data & Analytics Ltd, a 100% subsidiary of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. As a part of the transaction, the news department of Cogencis has been sold to Informist Media Pvt Ltd.

 

Informist Media Tel +91 (11) 4220-1000

Send comments to feedback@informistmedia.com

 

© Informist Media Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All rights reserved.

To read more please subscribe

Share this Story:

twitterlinkedinwhatsappmaillinkprint

Related Stories

Premium Stories

Subscribe