More Stories

Informist, Monday, Jun. 16, 2025

 

NEW DELHI – The Supreme Court on Monday refused to give interim bail to Amtek Group's former chairman Arvind Dham in connection with a bank fraud case of more than INR 250 billion. Dham, whose plea for extension of interim bail on medical grounds was rejected by the court in April, has grossly abused the process of the court by filing this petition, said the apex court. 

 

On Jul. 9, the probe agency had arrested Dham under provisions of money-laundering laws in the case of ACIL Ltd., an Amtek Group company. Subsequently, the Rouse Avenue court in Delhi had granted Dham's custody to the agency.

 

The Enforcement Directorate had initiated an investigation on the basis of first information reports registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation, arising from complaints by IDBI Bank Ltd. and Bank of Maharashtra. The complainants had alleged diversion of bank loans through cheating, fraud, and criminal breach of trust and causing wrongful loss to the bank under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 

 

The directorate said its probe had revealed that the Amtek Group had defaulted on loans exceeding INR 250 billion from more than 15 banks. The group companies, namely ARG Ltd., ACIL, Amtek Auto Ltd., Metalic Forging Ltd., and Castex Technologies Ltd., along with other group concerns, were taken to insolvency, whose resolution led to a haircut of more than 80% for banks, causing substantial losses to the financial system, the agency said. 

 

Further investigations show that Dham was the beneficial owner of several benami properties in companies that had employees of the Amtek Group like peons, drivers, field staff and persons with no linkage to the group companies acting as directors, the agency said. Dham continued to possess such properties beneficially held by him and never disclosed this to any of the creditors, the agency added.

 

In December, the Delhi High Court had upheld Dham's arrest by the Enforcement Directorate and the Rouse Avenue court's subsequent remand order. The high court had said that Dham's arrest was not against the provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and that judicial review of the grounds for arrest does not invite an adverse inference.  End

 

Reported by Surya Tripathi  

Edited by Deepshikha Bhardwaj

 

For users of real-time market data terminals, Informist news is available exclusively on the NSE Cogencis WorkStation.

 

Cogencis news is now Informist news. This follows the acquisition of Cogencis Information Services Ltd by NSE Data & Analytics Ltd, a 100% subsidiary of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. As a part of the transaction, the news department of Cogencis has been sold to Informist Media Pvt Ltd.

 

Informist Media Tel +91 (11) 4220-1000

Send comments to feedback@informistmedia.com

 

© Informist Media Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All rights reserved.